SOCIOCULTURAL IMPLICATIONS OF SON PREFERENCE A CASE OF DANYOR GILGIT

http://dx.doi.org/10.31703/gasr.2020(III-I).05      10.31703/gasr.2020(III-I).05      Published : Dec 1
Authored by : Aneela Sultana , Gulfam

05 Pages : 39-48

References

  • Arnold, F., Choe, M. K., & Roy, T. K. (1998). Son preference, the family-building process and child mortality in India. Population studies, 52(3), 301-315.
  • Blau, F. D., Kahn, L. M., Brummund, P., Cook, J., & Larson-Koester, M. (2020). Is there still son preference in the United States. Journal of Population Economics, 33(3), 709-750.
  • Cho, S., & Kim, H. (1995). Minjok Minjuwha Undonggwa Kabujangje (National Democracy Movement and Patriarchy). Thesis Collection to Commemorate 50th Anniversary of the National Independence, 8, 257- 290.
  • Clark, S. (2000). Son preference and sex composition of children: Evidence from India. Demography, 37(1), 95- 108.
  • Dahl, G. B., & Moretti, E. (2004). The demand for sons: Evidence from divorce, fertility, and shotgun marriage (No. w10281). National Bureau of Economic Research
  • Das Gupta, M., Zhenghua, J., Bohua, L., Zhenming, X., Chung, W., & Hwa-Ok, B. (2003). Why is son preference so persistent in East and South Asia? A cross-country study of China, India and the Republic of Korea. The Journal of Development Studies, 40(2), 153-187.
  • DaVanzo, J., Hale, L., Razzaque, A., & Rahman, M. (2007). Effects of interpregnancy interval and outcome of the preceding pregnancy on pregnancy outcomes in Matlab, Bangladesh. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 114(9), 1079-1087.
  • De Jonge, H. C., Azad, K., Seward, N., Kuddus, A., Shaha, S., Beard, J., ... & Fottrell, E. (2014). Determinants and consequences of short birth interval in rural Bangladesh: a cross-sectional study. BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 14(1), 1-7.
  • De Tray, D. (1984). Son preference in Pakistan: an analysis of intentions vs. behavior. Research in Population Economics, 5, 185-200
  • Edlund, L. (1999). Son preference, sex ratios, and marriage patterns. Journal of political Economy, 107(6), 1275- 1304.
  • Guilmoto, C. Z. (2012). Son preference, sex selection, and kinship in Vietnam. Population and development review, 38(1), 31-54.
  • Hank, K., & Kohler, H. P. (2002). Gender preferences for children revisited: new evidence from Germany. at: ideas. (accessed 6 October, 2019) repec. org/p/dem/wpaper/wp-2002-017. html
  • Haughton, J., & Haughton, D. (1995). Son Preference in Vietnam. Studies in Family Planning, 26(6), 325-337. doi:10.2307/2138098
  • Hussain, R., Fikree, F. F., & Berendes, H. W. (2000). The role of son preference in reproductive behaviour in Pakistan. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 78, 379-388.
  • Hyde Jr, L. M. (1984). Child Custody in Divorce-Generally. Juvenile & Family Court Journal, 35 (1).
  • Javed, R., & Mughal, M. (2020). Preference for boys and length of birth intervals in Pakistan. Research in Economics, 74(2), 140-152.
  • Jena, A. B., Goldman, D. P., & Joyce, G. (2011). Association between the birth of twins and parental divorce. Obstetrics and gynecology, 117(4), 892.
  • Kabeer, N., Huq, L., & Mahmud, S. (2014). Diverging stories of
  • Larsen, U., Chung, W., & Gupta, M. D. (1998). Fertility and son preference in Korea. Population Studies, 52(3), 317-325.
  • Moretti E, Dahl GB. The Demand for Sons. Review of Economic Studies. 2008;75:35.
  • Nag, M. (1991). Sex preference in Bangladesh India and Pakistan and its effect on fertility. Demography India, 20(2), 163-85.
  • Nag, M. (1991). Sex preference in Bangladesh India and Pakistan and its effect on fertility. Demography India, 20(2), 163-85
  • Pande, R. P., & Astone, N. M. (2007). Explaining son preference in rural India: the independent role of structural versus individual factors. Population Research and Policy Review, 26(1), 1-29.
  • Patel, A.B. Crises in Female Existence: Female Foeticide and Infanticide in India, International Journal of Criminology and Sociological Theory 2013;6(4):235-241.
  • Pollard, M. S., & Morgan, S. P. (2002). Emerging parental gender indifference? Sex composition of children and the third birth. American Sociological Review, 67(4), 600.
  • Raj, A. (2010). When the mother is a child: the impact of child marriage on the health and human rights of girls. Archives of disease in childhood, 95(11), 931-935.
  • Saha, U. R., & van Soest, A. (2011). Infant death clustering in families: magnitude, causes, and the influence of better health services, Bangladesh 1982-2005. Population studies, 65(3), 273-287.
  • Saleem S, Fikree FF. Induced abortions in low socioeconomic settlements of Karachi, Pakistan: rates and women\\\'s perspectives. J Pak Med Assoc 2001; 51: 275-9.
  • Schneider, F., & Enste, D. H. (2000). Shadow economies: Size, causes, and consequences. Journal of economic literature, 38(1), 77-114
  • Sedgh G, Henshaw S, Singh S, Ahman E, Shah IH. Induced abortion: estimated rates and trends worldwide. Lancet 2007; 370: 1338-45.
  • Shah, N., Hossain, N., Noonari, M., & Khan, N. H. (2011). Maternal mortality and morbidity of unsafe abortion in a university teaching hospital of Karachi, Pakistan. JPMA-Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association, 61(6), 582.
  • Shaikh, Z., Abbassi, R. M., Rizwan, N., & Abbasi, S. (2010). Morbidity and mortality due to unsafe abortion in Pakistan. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 110(1), 47-49.
  • Smyth, M. B., & Plotkin, G. D. (1982). The category-theoretic solution of recursive domain equations. SIAM Journal on Computing, 11(4), 761-783.
  • Tandon, S. L., & Sharma, R. (2006). Female Foeticide and Infanticide in India: An Analysis of Crimes against Girl Children. International journal of criminal justice sciences, 1(1).
  • Vickery, M., & Van Teijlingen, E. (2017). Female infanticide in India and its relevance to Nepal. Journal of Manmohan Memorial Institute of Health Sciences, 3(1), 79-85
  • Arnold, F., Choe, M. K., & Roy, T. K. (1998). Son preference, the family-building process and child mortality in India. Population studies, 52(3), 301-315.
  • Blau, F. D., Kahn, L. M., Brummund, P., Cook, J., & Larson-Koester, M. (2020). Is there still son preference in the United States. Journal of Population Economics, 33(3), 709-750.
  • Cho, S., & Kim, H. (1995). Minjok Minjuwha Undonggwa Kabujangje (National Democracy Movement and Patriarchy). Thesis Collection to Commemorate 50th Anniversary of the National Independence, 8, 257- 290.
  • Clark, S. (2000). Son preference and sex composition of children: Evidence from India. Demography, 37(1), 95- 108.
  • Dahl, G. B., & Moretti, E. (2004). The demand for sons: Evidence from divorce, fertility, and shotgun marriage (No. w10281). National Bureau of Economic Research
  • Das Gupta, M., Zhenghua, J., Bohua, L., Zhenming, X., Chung, W., & Hwa-Ok, B. (2003). Why is son preference so persistent in East and South Asia? A cross-country study of China, India and the Republic of Korea. The Journal of Development Studies, 40(2), 153-187.
  • DaVanzo, J., Hale, L., Razzaque, A., & Rahman, M. (2007). Effects of interpregnancy interval and outcome of the preceding pregnancy on pregnancy outcomes in Matlab, Bangladesh. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 114(9), 1079-1087.
  • De Jonge, H. C., Azad, K., Seward, N., Kuddus, A., Shaha, S., Beard, J., ... & Fottrell, E. (2014). Determinants and consequences of short birth interval in rural Bangladesh: a cross-sectional study. BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 14(1), 1-7.
  • De Tray, D. (1984). Son preference in Pakistan: an analysis of intentions vs. behavior. Research in Population Economics, 5, 185-200
  • Edlund, L. (1999). Son preference, sex ratios, and marriage patterns. Journal of political Economy, 107(6), 1275- 1304.
  • Guilmoto, C. Z. (2012). Son preference, sex selection, and kinship in Vietnam. Population and development review, 38(1), 31-54.
  • Hank, K., & Kohler, H. P. (2002). Gender preferences for children revisited: new evidence from Germany. at: ideas. (accessed 6 October, 2019) repec. org/p/dem/wpaper/wp-2002-017. html
  • Haughton, J., & Haughton, D. (1995). Son Preference in Vietnam. Studies in Family Planning, 26(6), 325-337. doi:10.2307/2138098
  • Hussain, R., Fikree, F. F., & Berendes, H. W. (2000). The role of son preference in reproductive behaviour in Pakistan. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 78, 379-388.
  • Hyde Jr, L. M. (1984). Child Custody in Divorce-Generally. Juvenile & Family Court Journal, 35 (1).
  • Javed, R., & Mughal, M. (2020). Preference for boys and length of birth intervals in Pakistan. Research in Economics, 74(2), 140-152.
  • Jena, A. B., Goldman, D. P., & Joyce, G. (2011). Association between the birth of twins and parental divorce. Obstetrics and gynecology, 117(4), 892.
  • Kabeer, N., Huq, L., & Mahmud, S. (2014). Diverging stories of
  • Larsen, U., Chung, W., & Gupta, M. D. (1998). Fertility and son preference in Korea. Population Studies, 52(3), 317-325.
  • Moretti E, Dahl GB. The Demand for Sons. Review of Economic Studies. 2008;75:35.
  • Nag, M. (1991). Sex preference in Bangladesh India and Pakistan and its effect on fertility. Demography India, 20(2), 163-85.
  • Nag, M. (1991). Sex preference in Bangladesh India and Pakistan and its effect on fertility. Demography India, 20(2), 163-85
  • Pande, R. P., & Astone, N. M. (2007). Explaining son preference in rural India: the independent role of structural versus individual factors. Population Research and Policy Review, 26(1), 1-29.
  • Patel, A.B. Crises in Female Existence: Female Foeticide and Infanticide in India, International Journal of Criminology and Sociological Theory 2013;6(4):235-241.
  • Pollard, M. S., & Morgan, S. P. (2002). Emerging parental gender indifference? Sex composition of children and the third birth. American Sociological Review, 67(4), 600.
  • Raj, A. (2010). When the mother is a child: the impact of child marriage on the health and human rights of girls. Archives of disease in childhood, 95(11), 931-935.
  • Saha, U. R., & van Soest, A. (2011). Infant death clustering in families: magnitude, causes, and the influence of better health services, Bangladesh 1982-2005. Population studies, 65(3), 273-287.
  • Saleem S, Fikree FF. Induced abortions in low socioeconomic settlements of Karachi, Pakistan: rates and women\\\'s perspectives. J Pak Med Assoc 2001; 51: 275-9.
  • Schneider, F., & Enste, D. H. (2000). Shadow economies: Size, causes, and consequences. Journal of economic literature, 38(1), 77-114
  • Sedgh G, Henshaw S, Singh S, Ahman E, Shah IH. Induced abortion: estimated rates and trends worldwide. Lancet 2007; 370: 1338-45.
  • Shah, N., Hossain, N., Noonari, M., & Khan, N. H. (2011). Maternal mortality and morbidity of unsafe abortion in a university teaching hospital of Karachi, Pakistan. JPMA-Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association, 61(6), 582.
  • Shaikh, Z., Abbassi, R. M., Rizwan, N., & Abbasi, S. (2010). Morbidity and mortality due to unsafe abortion in Pakistan. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 110(1), 47-49.
  • Smyth, M. B., & Plotkin, G. D. (1982). The category-theoretic solution of recursive domain equations. SIAM Journal on Computing, 11(4), 761-783.
  • Tandon, S. L., & Sharma, R. (2006). Female Foeticide and Infanticide in India: An Analysis of Crimes against Girl Children. International journal of criminal justice sciences, 1(1).
  • Vickery, M., & Van Teijlingen, E. (2017). Female infanticide in India and its relevance to Nepal. Journal of Manmohan Memorial Institute of Health Sciences, 3(1), 79-85

Cite this article

    CHICAGO : 2020. "Socio-Cultural Implications of Son Preference: A Case of Danyor, Gilgit." Global Anthropological Studies Review, III (I): 39-48 doi: 10.31703/gasr.2020(III-I).05
    HARVARD : 2020. Socio-Cultural Implications of Son Preference: A Case of Danyor, Gilgit. Global Anthropological Studies Review, III, 39-48.
    MHRA : 2020. "Socio-Cultural Implications of Son Preference: A Case of Danyor, Gilgit." Global Anthropological Studies Review, III: 39-48
    MLA : "Socio-Cultural Implications of Son Preference: A Case of Danyor, Gilgit." Global Anthropological Studies Review, III.I (2020): 39-48 Print.
    OXFORD : (2020), "Socio-Cultural Implications of Son Preference: A Case of Danyor, Gilgit", Global Anthropological Studies Review, III (I), 39-48