ARTICLE

SOCIOCULTURAL IMPLICATIONS OF SON PREFERENCE A CASE OF DANYOR GILGIT

05 Pages : 39-48

http://dx.doi.org/10.31703/gasr.2020(III-I).05      10.31703/gasr.2020(III-I).05      Published : Dec 1

Socio-Cultural Implications of Son Preference: A Case of Danyor, Gilgit

    The study deals with the dilemma of son preference and its causes and consequences. The fieldwork was conducted in village 'Danyor' in Gilgit-Baltistan, for the period of six months. Socio-economic survey was conducted from seventy-five households, detailed in-depth interviews were taken from thirty respondents in addition to 35 case studies. The field findings revealed the prevailing perceptions are sons as powerful and socially strong, owner and successor of family property, old age security for parents, symbol of prestige, custodian of family strength and honor etc. On the contrary, daughters are considered as burden of dowry and financial dependency on parents. The study concludes that son preference results in many discriminatory practices against female child such as abortion of female fetus, high infant mortality, lower status of daughters bearing mother in the family, short birth spacing, high probability of husband's remarriage and increased chances of being divorced.

    Divorce, Son Preference, Patriarchy, Gender Discrimination, Abortion, Short Birth Interval
    (1) Aneela Sultana
    In charge/ Assistant Professor, Department of Anthropology, Quaid-I-Azam University, Islamabad, Pakistan.
    (3) Gulfam
    MSc Student, Department of Anthropology, Quaid-I-Azam University, Islamabad, Pakistan.
  • Arnold, F., Choe, M. K., & Roy, T. K. (1998). Son preference, the family-building process and child mortality in India. Population studies, 52(3), 301-315.
  • Blau, F. D., Kahn, L. M., Brummund, P., Cook, J., & Larson-Koester, M. (2020). Is there still son preference in the United States. Journal of Population Economics, 33(3), 709-750.
  • Cho, S., & Kim, H. (1995). Minjok Minjuwha Undonggwa Kabujangje (National Democracy Movement and Patriarchy). Thesis Collection to Commemorate 50th Anniversary of the National Independence, 8, 257- 290.
  • Clark, S. (2000). Son preference and sex composition of children: Evidence from India. Demography, 37(1), 95- 108.
  • Dahl, G. B., & Moretti, E. (2004). The demand for sons: Evidence from divorce, fertility, and shotgun marriage (No. w10281). National Bureau of Economic Research
  • Das Gupta, M., Zhenghua, J., Bohua, L., Zhenming, X., Chung, W., & Hwa-Ok, B. (2003). Why is son preference so persistent in East and South Asia? A cross-country study of China, India and the Republic of Korea. The Journal of Development Studies, 40(2), 153-187.
  • DaVanzo, J., Hale, L., Razzaque, A., & Rahman, M. (2007). Effects of interpregnancy interval and outcome of the preceding pregnancy on pregnancy outcomes in Matlab, Bangladesh. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 114(9), 1079-1087.
  • De Jonge, H. C., Azad, K., Seward, N., Kuddus, A., Shaha, S., Beard, J., ... & Fottrell, E. (2014). Determinants and consequences of short birth interval in rural Bangladesh: a cross-sectional study. BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 14(1), 1-7.
  • De Tray, D. (1984). Son preference in Pakistan: an analysis of intentions vs. behavior. Research in Population Economics, 5, 185-200
  • Edlund, L. (1999). Son preference, sex ratios, and marriage patterns. Journal of political Economy, 107(6), 1275- 1304.
  • Guilmoto, C. Z. (2012). Son preference, sex selection, and kinship in Vietnam. Population and development review, 38(1), 31-54.
  • Hank, K., & Kohler, H. P. (2002). Gender preferences for children revisited: new evidence from Germany. at: ideas. (accessed 6 October, 2019) repec. org/p/dem/wpaper/wp-2002-017. html
  • Haughton, J., & Haughton, D. (1995). Son Preference in Vietnam. Studies in Family Planning, 26(6), 325-337. doi:10.2307/2138098
  • Hussain, R., Fikree, F. F., & Berendes, H. W. (2000). The role of son preference in reproductive behaviour in Pakistan. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 78, 379-388.
  • Hyde Jr, L. M. (1984). Child Custody in Divorce-Generally. Juvenile & Family Court Journal, 35 (1).
  • Javed, R., & Mughal, M. (2020). Preference for boys and length of birth intervals in Pakistan. Research in Economics, 74(2), 140-152.
  • Jena, A. B., Goldman, D. P., & Joyce, G. (2011). Association between the birth of twins and parental divorce. Obstetrics and gynecology, 117(4), 892.
  • Kabeer, N., Huq, L., & Mahmud, S. (2014). Diverging stories of
  • Larsen, U., Chung, W., & Gupta, M. D. (1998). Fertility and son preference in Korea. Population Studies, 52(3), 317-325.
  • Moretti E, Dahl GB. The Demand for Sons. Review of Economic Studies. 2008;75:35.
  • Nag, M. (1991). Sex preference in Bangladesh India and Pakistan and its effect on fertility. Demography India, 20(2), 163-85.
  • Nag, M. (1991). Sex preference in Bangladesh India and Pakistan and its effect on fertility. Demography India, 20(2), 163-85
  • Pande, R. P., & Astone, N. M. (2007). Explaining son preference in rural India: the independent role of structural versus individual factors. Population Research and Policy Review, 26(1), 1-29.
  • Patel, A.B. Crises in Female Existence: Female Foeticide and Infanticide in India, International Journal of Criminology and Sociological Theory 2013;6(4):235-241.
  • Pollard, M. S., & Morgan, S. P. (2002). Emerging parental gender indifference? Sex composition of children and the third birth. American Sociological Review, 67(4), 600.
  • Raj, A. (2010). When the mother is a child: the impact of child marriage on the health and human rights of girls. Archives of disease in childhood, 95(11), 931-935.
  • Saha, U. R., & van Soest, A. (2011). Infant death clustering in families: magnitude, causes, and the influence of better health services, Bangladesh 1982-2005. Population studies, 65(3), 273-287.
  • Saleem S, Fikree FF. Induced abortions in low socioeconomic settlements of Karachi, Pakistan: rates and women\\\'s perspectives. J Pak Med Assoc 2001; 51: 275-9.
  • Schneider, F., & Enste, D. H. (2000). Shadow economies: Size, causes, and consequences. Journal of economic literature, 38(1), 77-114
  • Sedgh G, Henshaw S, Singh S, Ahman E, Shah IH. Induced abortion: estimated rates and trends worldwide. Lancet 2007; 370: 1338-45.
  • Shah, N., Hossain, N., Noonari, M., & Khan, N. H. (2011). Maternal mortality and morbidity of unsafe abortion in a university teaching hospital of Karachi, Pakistan. JPMA-Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association, 61(6), 582.
  • Shaikh, Z., Abbassi, R. M., Rizwan, N., & Abbasi, S. (2010). Morbidity and mortality due to unsafe abortion in Pakistan. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 110(1), 47-49.
  • Smyth, M. B., & Plotkin, G. D. (1982). The category-theoretic solution of recursive domain equations. SIAM Journal on Computing, 11(4), 761-783.
  • Tandon, S. L., & Sharma, R. (2006). Female Foeticide and Infanticide in India: An Analysis of Crimes against Girl Children. International journal of criminal justice sciences, 1(1).
  • Vickery, M., & Van Teijlingen, E. (2017). Female infanticide in India and its relevance to Nepal. Journal of Manmohan Memorial Institute of Health Sciences, 3(1), 79-85

Cite this article

    CHICAGO : 2020. "Socio-Cultural Implications of Son Preference: A Case of Danyor, Gilgit." Global Anthropological Studies Review, III (I): 39-48 doi: 10.31703/gasr.2020(III-I).05
    HARVARD : 2020. Socio-Cultural Implications of Son Preference: A Case of Danyor, Gilgit. Global Anthropological Studies Review, III, 39-48.
    MHRA : 2020. "Socio-Cultural Implications of Son Preference: A Case of Danyor, Gilgit." Global Anthropological Studies Review, III: 39-48
    MLA : "Socio-Cultural Implications of Son Preference: A Case of Danyor, Gilgit." Global Anthropological Studies Review, III.I (2020): 39-48 Print.
    OXFORD : (2020), "Socio-Cultural Implications of Son Preference: A Case of Danyor, Gilgit", Global Anthropological Studies Review, III (I), 39-48